Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] any Sony rx 1 users
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:31:37 -0800
References: <452487a7-47a1-4f21-9964-3842792b1d23@store0.postmaster.co.uk> <CD4050D4.51D1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CABmfTOV5F0v9OF28R+BaQJpWSW0NLxMXj9MMK83cqCfYYKZcxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-EtzK6ViiXT=m1Jmcz7pz42yJkD-Hq1ypw06Q5o9d0L8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh4vvFk+GsyBL70JBSEwWKVFcn9HsQQ9=YsJnW42XdaNUg@mail.gmail.com>
This is M9 + 35/1.4ASPH LUX
http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20130211-L1017831-Edit.jpg
I just printed it 17x22" Looks pretty darn good.
I may get a 4x5" though. Heck, I'm almost certainly will get a 4x5"
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to give the impression that the Sony RX1 is a bad camera,
> but it just did not have the performance that the MTF charts, and some
> other reports suggest. To me the M9 is the first and still best
> compact full frame.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
--
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
Replies:
Reply from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
In reply to:
Message from owl at postmaster.co.uk (John Owlett) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)