Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:00:34 -0400
References: <C7F55C99.30345%chris@chriscrawfordphoto.com> <5522F257-2745-4BBD-98A1-7FD2A9EED3CE@verizon.net> <0ABC6340-99B5-4971-9B7B-0D9D0EFCCC71@ameritech.net> <u2r36172e5a1004240550h8756ce0u9670f11e7f726a6f@mail.gmail.com>

Medical experiments?  :-)  My boy is safe until they have a dual- or triple- 
focal length lens in the F/2.8 range...

Cheers
Dante

NO ARCHIVE

On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Dante, I've never shot the current Summilux 35 ASPH. and can't comment on 
> it
> from any personal experience. It has been reported as having some
> identifiable focus shift in the most critical cases (from article in LFI).
> Peter Karbe has recently said that the lenses are optimised for best
> performance at infinity. I understood the floating element arrangement to
> assist in the close in performance and reduce focus shift. That is my
> experience with the 50 Summilux ASPH. and the APO 75 Summicron ASPH. at
> least. That is to say I get very consistent and accurate focus in the 1 to
> 3m range where I shoot them most and have never identified any focus shift
> (down to ~f/4).
> I ordered the lens (at least I have my name down and they will accept my
> deposit when it is actually officially announced). I'll let you know,
> probably months hence. It will take months to find the dollars anyway ;-) I
> may sell my children for medical experiments.
> 
> f/1.4 and be there
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> On 24 April 2010 22:26, Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net> wrote:
> 
>> The floating element is designed to promote consistently good focus along 
>> a
>> distance range, which in the Nikon world made lenses that shot well at a
>> distance shoot well close-up (since a lens can really only be optimized 
>> for
>> one distance/repro ratio if the elements move as a unit).
>> 
>> But since the current Summilux ASPH already seems to shoot better close-up
>> than at a distance, is the floating element designed to fix the
>> long-distance end?
>> 
>> Dante
>> 
>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Leonard Taupier wrote:
>> 
>>> Actually Nikon introduced the floating element in the 24mm in 1967, their
>> first. Mine is a 1972 model which I had converted to AI in 1980 or so. I
>> still have that lens plus the AF version. I have most of the Nikon MF 
>> lenses
>> which were given new life with the release of the D700.
>>> 
>>> I also have the 35mm Summilux ASPH which I plan to keep.
>>> 
>>> Len
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 1:53 AM, Chris Crawford wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Floating elements are not new. My old Nikon 24mm f2.8D AF-Nikkor has
>> them.
>>>> So does my Olympus OM 85mm f2 and 50mm f2 Macro. The Olympus lenses are
>>>> 25-30 yrs old and the Nikkor is 16.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Crawford
>>>> Fine Art Photography
>>>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>>>> 260-424-0897
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>>>> 
>>>> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/22/10 1:18 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 2 things to note..... first, New Leica lenses cost $5K+
>>>>> Second, it is no longer sufficient to have ASPH elements.... they must
>> be
>>>>> FLOATING ......
>>>>> 
>>>>> Floating is the new Leica Buzzword....
>>>>> 
>>>>> ( yes, I understand the issue of back focus.....)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Frank Filippone
>>>>> red735i at earthlink.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> Another new toy to consider:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> http://leica-camera.com.ua/assets/Info_09_2010_LEICA_SUMMILUX-M_1.4_35mm_ASP
>>>>> H._Engl.pdf
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Product code: 11663
>>>>> 
>>>>> Approx. US$5,000.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] New Summilux-M 35/1.4 ASPH. #11663)