Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Wed Dec 10 14:37:51 2008
References: <1936256575.7031311228886752414.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu><C5659474.46421%mark@rabinergroup.com> <BLU115-W51954618AD2F3284DA357182FB0@phx.gbl> <7F6FA8054D594F539468FB77C552272E@D1S9FY41>

Seth,

Your review in VF Vol 37 No 4 is very impressive. It's probably the  
most comprehension review of any lens I've ever seen. After you  
mentioned the 2.8 Summaron I went searching the web for it. Yup it's  
gotten up there in price. I wish I had one as that generation of  
Leica lenses give me the look I really like.

Len


On Dec 10, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Seth Rosner wrote:

> Greg, it is why eBay prices for the 35/2,8 Summaron have risen  
> recently. The 3/4 sensor eliminates the corner fall-off in both  
> resolution and contrast and reduces to a hardly perceptible minimum  
> this lens' field curvature. Not owning an M8 (yet) I cannot confirm  
> my opinon that this lens will now outperform the 35 Summicrons  
> right up until the ASPH version while preserving the well-known  
> Leica look of the period. The legend that this lens lacks contrast  
> is simply untrue. And stopped down to 5,6, it is not too far from  
> the ASPH version. See VIEWFINDER Vol 37 No 4, pp 39-40.
>
> Seth
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Lorenzo"  
> <gregj_lorenzo@hotmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group LUG" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 3:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question
>
>
>
> The 35 I'd use would have to have the right look (for me). This  
> probably means not the latest version of Leica's current 35mm lens  
> line.
>
> Greg Lorenzo
> Calgary, Canada> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:44:52 -0500> Subject:  
> Re: [Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question> From:  
> mark@rabinergroup.com> To: lug@leica-users.org> > If you're used to  
> 50's then with an M8 I'd find a nice 35 to have be your> favorite  
> lens.> 35 * 1.33> = 46.55> > > A 50 gives you 65. Not so much an  
> "all around" lens.> > > > mark@rabinergroup.com> Mark William  
> Rabiner> > > > > From: Alan Magayne-Roshak <amr3@uwm.edu>> > Reply- 
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>> > Date: Tue, 9 Dec  
> 2008 23:25:52 -0600 (CST)> > To: lug <lug@leica-users.org>> >  
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question> > > > Original  
> Message:> >> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:52:43 -0500> >> From: Leonard  
> Taupier <len-001@verizon.net>> > > >> The 50mm collapsible  
> Summicron has absolutely no problem when> >> collapsed on the M8  
> body. The clearance from the end of the collapsed> >> mount to the  
> M8 shutter is about 1/2". I don't know about the 90mm> >> Elmar.  
> But if you have the lens just measure the distance from the> >>  
> mount to the end of the collapsed lens. The M8 flange to shutter>  
> >> distance is about 31/32". If the collapsed lens is 3/4" or  
> greater> >> from mount to end I probably would not collapse it when  
> on the M8. In> >> any case I have a few collapsible lenses with  
> adequate clearance but> >> always keep them extended as leica  
> recommends. The 90mm macro which> >> Leica says is OK does not  
> extend pass the lens mount at all.> >  
> __________________________________________________________________>  
> > Thanks for the information(Nathan too).> > > > I have collapsible  
> Summicrons in both bayonet and LTM, plus the 90 Elmar> >  
> collapsible, and I use that feature all the time, so I wondered if  
> these would> > work if I won the lottery and was able to get an  
> M8. ;~)> > > > > > Alan> > > > Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior  
> Photographer> > UPAA POY 1978> > University Information Technology  
> Services> > University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee> > http:// 
> gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/> > > > > > > > > >  
> _______________________________________________> > Leica Users  
> Group.> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
> information> > > > _______________________________________________>  
> Leica Users Group.> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug  
> for more information
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
> http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail? 
> ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_122008
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1841 - Release Date:  
> 12/10/2008 9:30 AM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question)
Reply from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question)
In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question)
Message from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8 - A Question)