Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Mon Oct 20 17:28:03 2008
References: <C5226DD1.43011%mark@rabinergroup.com> <48FCB9DA.6691.CC8C13@leica.rcmckee.com> <47D44F4BE9754232AE9D7F5281C8365E@dadquad> <48FCCDD4.11250.11A929F@leica.rcmckee.com> <4154E3717B0B42FDB4F0A8E96787331D@dadquad>

If it was kept cold, It oughta be ok.

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Geoff Hopkinson 
<hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>wrote:

> Clayton I follow what you are saying. Should I have said, It doesn't make
> sense for my type of photography to use outdated pro film?
> Post some pictures of your experimenting, folks.  I thawed several rolls of
> 120 to shoot for fun in my 645, but now have found some of it sadly out of
> date. I shot about 50 frames with my M8 instead, and even posted a new
> casual portrait (that sunk without trace!) So I did go shoot.
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/104733063
> I'm having a printing day instead and continue working on the Leica Users
> Photo Album book I am editing. Also I have just got my Photoshop CS4 update
> and am starting to learn the new tools  and doing some training on it.
>
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: RE: [Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS
> 160?
>
> Quoth the Geoff Hopkinson :
>
> > Clayton, that's an interesting anecdote, but I'm not sure it is
> > applicable here. Experimenting with outdated pro film doesn't seem to
> > have any upside.
>
> Geoff,
>
> That's only true if you're both absolutely certain that your imagination
> and
> technical skills are capable of planning and executing the best possible
> image in any circumstance, AND if you're correct in that certainty, such
> that nothing unexpected could ever benefit you.
>
> Fortunately for me, I am absolutely certain I will never reach that level;
> my problem is that from time to time I drift into acting, and shooting, as
> though I have.  (Usually at that point my own work starts to bore me.)
>
> > Every other outcome is worse.
>
> May you never lose that kind of certainty.
>
> And may I never live long enough to have it.
>
> Each to his own.  Go shoot.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA

Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)