Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LR 4.1 question
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 15:01:04 -0500
References: <4FD2713A.6000202@cox.net><CAE3QcF4oJ3cJaXCP3kBauuHDdpxF6on+fP38NUnR0gXQ28UV2Q@mail.gmail.com><4FD29A86.8080902@cox.net><CAJ4y7gwcrQQXHZnHcC6vre76KrV5EG1qgDsnN==YJjP19z8_UA@mail.gmail.com><4FD37D5A.9060707@cox.net><E8E62B38-70E2-4D8C-83F1-6327EF0FC18E@gmail.com> <BLU139-DS10ACDF32715E06D520E09BB8F10@phx.gbl>

Could it be as simple as a file naming problem?  Duplicate names in a 
directory are a problem.  The same name in a different directory is fine.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8 at hotmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LR 4.1 question


> Not sure what that would do for him, as he is viewing the files on the 
> same monitor.  I find it odd that if he saves the file in a different 
> directory the problem does not exist.  That is odd.
>
> Aram
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Leowesson" <leowesson at gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 11:16 AM
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] LR 4.1 question
>
>> Do you calibrate your monitor?
>>
>> Leo Wesson
>> www.leowesson.com
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2012, at 11:44, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks.  I've given up for now.  I also downloaded PS6 and ACR 7.1, but 
>>> the same problem occurs.  Everything is fine until I save the tif or psd 
>>> file in the same directory with the raw file.  The differences between 
>>> the (unadjusted in PS) saved image and the raw image range from subtle 
>>> to enormous.   I guess it is not that big a problem - I can adjust in 
>>> LR, edit in PS and then just save the tif file in a different directory. 
>>> It is only when I save the PS image in the same directory with the raw 
>>> file that either LR or PS is doing something to the image.
>>>
>>> Ken
>>>
>>> On 6/8/2012 8:10 PM, Robert Baron wrote:
>>>> When you click 'edit in PS' from LR you are given a choice of whether 
>>>> to
>>>> send it to PS with or without the adjustments you have made in LR.  If 
>>>> you
>>>> haven't made any, the file opened in PS should open as a RAW file w/o 
>>>> any
>>>> adjustments. All things equal it should look the same, so obviously a
>>>> change is being made to it somewhere along the line.
>>>>
>>>> Then when you return it to LR are you returning the original file or a 
>>>> file
>>>> with the changes you made in PS?
>>>>
>>>> I know that consistency is reputed to be the hobgoblin of small minds 
>>>> but
>>>> there is something disrupting the consistency of your workflow.  Your
>>>> assignment is to figure out what it is.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you should get into preferences / file handling and preferences
>>>> /external editing and see if there are any clues there.
>>>>
>>>> --Bob
>>>>
>>>> ==On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Ken Carney<kcarney1 at cox.net>  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Geoff,
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it is difficult to follow - it was written by a C.P.A.  Try
>>>>> reading some of our financial statements.  I tried the same thing 
>>>>> using LR
>>>>> 3.6 and PS 4 and PS 5.1 - same thing.  If I open (edit in) PS and save 
>>>>> the
>>>>> tif, viewing the two in LR (raw file and tif) the tif is much lighter,
>>>>> actually blown out.  If I choose "develop" in LR for the tif, the
>>>>> brightness setting is much higher than the CR2 I chose to "edit in 
>>>>> PS".
>>>>> As I suspected from the beginning, this is obviously a conspiracy to
>>>>> require an upgrade to CS6.  Thanks much for your comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/8/2012 5:13 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken, that's difficult to follow! I might be able to shed some light 
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> of it at least.
>>>>>> PS 5.1 uses ACR6.7 which does not support all of the functions of 
>>>>>> LR4.1.
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> does not understand some possible raw adjustments and ignores them.
>>>>>> Photoshop CS6 uses the same raw engine as LR4.1. The current version 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> Adobe Camera Raw  7.1xxx
>>>>>> Possibly there may be some profile changes for your Canon Raw files 
>>>>>> too?
>>>>>> Canon of course is a major client target and updates for Canon would 
>>>>>> be a
>>>>>> high priority for Adobe. I'm sure it doesn't hurt that Mr Knoll is a 
>>>>>> Canon
>>>>>> user ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The working colour space in the raw converter is not the same thing 
>>>>>> as a
>>>>>> colour space assigned to converted files (such as TIFFs). I think 
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> linear anyway, that is needs a big curve applied to become something 
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> easily relate to. But if you export a version as a TIFF you can 
>>>>>> choose to
>>>>>> make that Pro Photo as you did to preserve the maximum information. 
>>>>>> Keep
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> mind that you can't see all of the information in there on your 
>>>>>> monitor
>>>>>> nor
>>>>>> in a print.
>>>>>> For most monitors sRGB is more likely with a few high end ones very 
>>>>>> close
>>>>>> to all of Adobe RGB which is very largely covered by good inkjet 
>>>>>> printers
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, 9 June 2012, Ken Carney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I have seen a number of references to this problem in the Adobe 
>>>>>> forum,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> have not seen an answer to it.  Hopefully the wisdom of the LUG will 
>>>>>>> bail
>>>>>>> me out once more.  I can import a raw file (CR2) into LR 4.1, and 
>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>> select edit in PS 5.1.  If I save the PS file (as a tif), then in LR 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> CR2 and the saved tif files look quite different.  Sometimes the tif 
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> be lighter, sometimes darker.  If I make any adjustments in PS, then 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> saved tif can look very different from the CR2 file.  The odd thing 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> when I look at the file as opened in PS (edit in PS) without any
>>>>>>> adjustments, it looks the same as the CR2 file in LR.  So something 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> happening when I save the PS file (if I just open the saved tif in 
>>>>>>> PS,
>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>> enough it looks just like the saved tif file as seen in LR, i.e.,
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> from the CR2 file).   I have ACR 6.7 which is supposed to be 
>>>>>>> compatible
>>>>>>> with LR 4.1 and both programs use ProPhoto as the color space. 
>>>>>>> Sorry for
>>>>>>> the long question, but does anyone know what I am missing?  Thanks 
>>>>>>> much,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See 
>>>>>>> http://leica-users.org/****mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug>
>>>>>>> <http://**leica-users.org/mailman/**listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>>for
>>>>>>> more information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See 
>>>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>>>  
>>>>> more information
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leowesson) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question)