Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Also if Mark's right that Larry (probably sleeping but we need him back in the thread...) needs a 1.5 sensor then how about that new samsung? (exchangeable lenses/live view finder). there was a thread a few days ago following the the NY Times review of it. And Mark, note that yes in the past he had a IIIc and Rollei 35 and even a Minox but lately he's been getting along with a Canon point and shoot well below the level of other cameras we're talking about here. He's asking for advice finding something better than that -- not better than or even equal to a Leica IIIc. On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>wrote: > > Vince, > > > > I like my G11 a lot, but I almost NEVER use the optical viewfinder. > > It's squinty and not very clear even with diopter correction and gives > > you an incredibly poor idea of the actual field of view of the lens. > > IMHO, it's worthless, except as an emergency finder when bright > > sunlight or some other factor makes the LCD impossible to use. That's > > why I bought my GH1. Well actually I bought it so I could use my Leica > > and Nikon glass, but the viewfinder was the bonus that sealed the deal > > for me. > > > > Jim > > > > I agree Jim. > Below is Larry Z's original post. Long lost in a flurry of mini camrea > posts. > He used to carry a Leica IIIC or a Rollei 35. > These were cameras which could be used on real photo jobs and were 24x36mm > format and were otherwise taken seriously and could produce competitive > results. > The ones being mentioned on this thread are worthy of mentioning in the > same > paragraph as a IIIC. > You'll find them at the bottom of a pros camera bag as a backup the 4/3's > cameras or smaller. > They don't head out and do a job with one. > He's looking for a small camrea with a nice sized sensor. > Id think a 1.5 crop factor at the minimum. > > The sensor on his current one is a 1/2.3 > > > > > For the last 50 years I've carried a camera with me most of the time and > > react almost instantly to a photo op. The camera has to be pocket sized > so > > that it won't interfere with whatever else I am doing. For years it was > an > > old Leica IIIc with a 35 mm f2.8 Canon lens or a 50 mm Elmar that could > fit > > into the side pocket of a windbreaker. When I traveled it was usually a > > Rollei 35 in a small belt holster. I even carried a Minox when I wore a > suit > > and tie. True, I owned bigger and more professional equipment which I > used > > when I had to take serious pictures but they were usually too bulky to > carry > > everyday. But for a variety of reasons I gave up my wet darkroom and my > film > > cameras became too inconvenient to use. Now I carry a wafer thin Canon > > SD1200IS. It has a 10 MP sensor and is smaller and lighter than any of > the > > others (except the Minox). > > > > > > The big problem is that when I post pictures to the LUG, I can see > obvious > > quality differences between my pocket cameras and the M8 and M9 Leicas > and > > DSLR's that most Luggers use. What I would like is suggestions for a > carry > > digital camera that will close the gap. I don't expect M9 quality but I > > don't want to be embarrassed either. My criteria are the the camera has > to > > be smaller and much lighter than a Barnack Leica and have an optical > > viewfinder. The optical finder is necessary because I wear bifocals and > have > > to bob my head up and down like a pigeon when using a LCD camera screen. > I'm > > not sure if any of the new 4/3 cameras will fill the bill but I'm not > > opposed to the format. I own an Olympus DSLR and I find it more than > > adequate. The problem is that I live more than 50 miles from any large > > camera store and I don't get to see and handle any of the newer compact > > cameras. > > > > > > Can any Lugger offer suggestions for a good carry camera? > > > Larry Z > > [Rabs] > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >