Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mar 1, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > Not meant to be in any way scientific, but I was very impressed with the > output from the X1 when I got to try it briefly. See here plus a similar > frame from the S2. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/2/JX1.jpg.html I hope he is paying for your lunch, ;-) Steve > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 2 March 2010 10:32, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> >> A reason why the X1 is a big deal. >>> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close to it. >>> >> >> However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.8 (same size as M8 and 9) >> >> A reason why the S2 is a big deal. >>> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close to it. >>> >> >> However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.0 (smaller than above) >> >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information