Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:32:37 -0600
References: <C7B1A26B.5E7F5%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> A reason why the X1 is a big deal.
> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage.  Or darned close  
> to it.

However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.8 (same size as M8 and 9)

> A reason why the S2 is a big deal.
> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close  
> to it.

However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.0 (smaller than above)

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)