Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE/large prints
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:22:11 -0800
References: <C7B1AD42.5E81E%mark@rabinergroup.com>

On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>> Steve Barbour asks:
>> 
>> "how large are the prints that people are now making ? people like us,
>> who are not decorating the side of buses...?
>> 20x30 " ?   bigger  ? or  8x10" or maybe not at all  ?  maybe mostly
>> internet 800 pixel jpegs ?
>> one gets an impression that as people talk bigger, less prints of any
>> size are now being  made...
>> of course some few are making huge prints, how many ?....less than a
>> majority...?"
>> 
>> In absolute numbers?  I'll bet more rather than fewer, because things
>> like 24" and 44" inkjet printers (and rentals of such) are now readily
>> available and produce great results.   As large as my epson 9900 is,
>> it's very small compared to the darkroom and enlarger that could create
>> a 43x95 print.   And I make such prints with composites of 35mm FF
>> digital images, something I could never manage in the darkroom, though
>> some could.
>> 
>> So in absolute terms, it's easier to make large and very large prints.
>> 
>> In *relative* terms snap-load-email-to-some-web-page is easier than ANY
>> scheme with film, and so I'm sure the point that smallish .jpegs and
>> smallish prints dominate on % of volume is totally true.   And of
>> course, current cameras already saturate these image sizes....
>> 
> 
> 
> The Epson 3800 and now 3800 has been ubiquitous in for years the standard 
> of
> the industry and for most workers used to dark rooming their serious stuff
> 16x20 for a shot or portfolio this covers it as it goes to 17x22 which is a
> size hard to fit under your arm in a portfolio as you walk down the street.
> At least with the handle at the top.
> 
> I was able to print 20x24 in the darkroom but made a ton more 16x20's.
> Now a ton more people



is a ton a lot of people.... ?  

you can use Jim Shulman's images as a standard,

Steve


> can print bigger than 11x14 then before.
> 
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE/large prints)