Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:12:25 -0700
References: <e3f5d999e64582419b039710232acd2e@cshore.com>
 
The worst are the 21mm S/A, the Tele-Elmarit 90mm, the 50mm Summarit,  
and the last lens you spent too much money for just to shoot flowers.
S.d.


On May 10, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Nygren wrote:

> What in your opinion are the best four M lenses and why? What are  
> the four worst?
>
> I thought it would be interesting to read how the luggers would  
> answer these questions.
>
> I realize that best and worst are subjective. Subjective answers  
> are welcome as are so-called objective replies. Un-welcome is the  
> rhetoric that all the M book writers employ.
>
> Which are the lenses to die for, which should check into the dog  
> pound, and why, of course?
>
> Have fun--Doug
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)
Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)
 In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)