Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:14:38 -0700
References: <e3f5d999e64582419b039710232acd2e@cshore.com> <511BBB89-6AFB-4CEE-B02C-F6EA8FD162BB@charter.net>

slobadan, what don't you like about the 50 summarit and is the tele-elmarit
90 the latest 90/2.8 ?

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Slobodan Dimitrov
<s.dimitrov at charter.net>wrote:

> The worst are the 21mm S/A, the Tele-Elmarit 90mm, the 50mm Summarit, and
> the last lens you spent too much money for just to shoot flowers.
> S.d.
>
>
>
> On May 10, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Nygren wrote:
>
>  What in your opinion are the best four M lenses and why? What are the four
>> worst?
>>
>> I thought it would be interesting to read how the luggers would answer
>> these questions.
>>
>> I realize that best and worst are subjective. Subjective answers are
>> welcome as are so-called objective replies. Un-welcome is the rhetoric 
>> that
>> all the M book writers employ.
>>
>> Which are the lenses to die for, which should check into the dog pound,
>> and why, of course?
>>
>> Have fun--Doug
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
 -------------------------------------
 regards, mehrdad


Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)
In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses)