Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]S.D. I assume you refer to the original 50/1.5 Summarit? I would include the Hektor 73mm f/1.9. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov at charter.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses > The worst are the 21mm S/A, the Tele-Elmarit 90mm, the 50mm Summarit, and > the last lens you spent too much money for just to shoot flowers. > S.d. > > > On May 10, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Nygren wrote: > >> What in your opinion are the best four M lenses and why? What are the >> four worst? >> >> I thought it would be interesting to read how the luggers would answer >> these questions. >> >> I realize that best and worst are subjective. Subjective answers are >> welcome as are so-called objective replies. Un-welcome is the rhetoric >> that all the M book writers employ. >> >> Which are the lenses to die for, which should check into the dog pound, >> and why, of course? >> >> Have fun--Doug >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >