Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yeah! But for some reason I find that the LTM version works better for me. Maybe because of the nature of the finder, and its inability to find focus under many lighting conditions, keeps me from stressing it out too much. S.d. On May 10, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Jim Nichols wrote: > S.D. > > I assume you refer to the original 50/1.5 Summarit? I would > include the Hektor 73mm f/1.9. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" > <s.dimitrov at charter.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:12 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] 4 best and worst M lenses > > >> The worst are the 21mm S/A, the Tele-Elmarit 90mm, the 50mm >> Summarit, and the last lens you spent too much money for just to >> shoot flowers. >> S.d. >> >> >> On May 10, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Nygren wrote: >> >>> What in your opinion are the best four M lenses and why? What >>> are the four worst? >>> >>> I thought it would be interesting to read how the luggers would >>> answer these questions. >>> >>> I realize that best and worst are subjective. Subjective answers >>> are welcome as are so-called objective replies. Un-welcome is >>> the rhetoric that all the M book writers employ. >>> >>> Which are the lenses to die for, which should check into the dog >>> pound, and why, of course? >>> >>> Have fun--Doug >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information