Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] No Ladies Allowed
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Sat Dec 9 18:51:03 2006
References: <001201c71c03$ec34c770$6401a8c0@asus930>

Gritty? maybe but I gotta say now all my testosterone moments are about 
that long.

G Hopkinson wrote:

>I don't get it. I guess this is someone slightly famous maybe? Probably an 
>old picture, I suppose.
>Is that a surgery scar or a perfect candidate for the spot healing tool? It 
>all seems awfully gritty. Walt, were you having a
>testosterone moment when you posted ;-) I don't see any Santa hat or 
>magenta cast to make in On Topic!
>Cheers
>Hoppy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
>[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Steve Barbour
>Sent: Sunday, 10 December 2006 11:13
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Leica] No Ladies Allowed
>
>
>On Dec 9, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Walt Johnson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Caution for the Men on the LUG...No women...No Kiddies...This means  
>>you too Javier
>>
>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/waltjohnson/fanne.jpg.html
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>ouch...she looks chilly...
>
>
>Steve
>
>
>  
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] No Ladies Allowed)