Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Tue Nov 7 10:02:51 2006
References: <00c401c70155$4d761260$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <454EB466.3090205@eth.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061106070325.024ecdb0@infoave.net> <454FDF93.7050900@eth.net> <455097CF.7000707@waltjohnson.com> <1162917166.2A4A8DF3@fd5.dngr.org> <4550C8F7.8060201@waltjohnson.com>

On Nov 7, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Walt Johnson wrote:

> Rei
> I don't think MPs were snake oil and if I didn't have M3s and M6s  
> my choice would be an MP. It looked to me as if the company saw  
> some of their marketing errors and hoped to regroup with a  
> mechanical camera. If I wanted an automated camera it would be a  
> Nikon or Canon. Personally, I prefer the M6 and the idea of  
> changing dial designs (M6TTL) seemed idiotic. The years I spent  
> shooting professionally convinced me of a few "golden rules". One  
> of the most important is to keep the equipment I carry the same.  
> Same bodies, different focal lengths. I don't  even want to look at  
> the settings while shooting but dial them by feel.
>
> As far as not working professionally, there are some misconceptions  
> about that. Anyone can use a camera and learn to do it well. I even  
> doctor myself from time to time without ill effects. If you are  
> doing something which excites you that is what counts. If you are  
> doing an assignment for a national magazine even cow poop photos  
> must look good. That is the biggest difference.
>
> Walt
>
> p.s Recently has surgery and reluctantly let the doctor do it. :-)


you da man Walt....

:-)

Steve


>
> Rei Shinozuka wrote:
>
>> I am no working professional, but I would like to defend the mp as  
>> more than marketing snake-oil.  Prior to the mp, my favorite  
>> camera was the m6 0.85 and I also had an m3 upgraded to m6-style  
>> loading.  In short, the mp contained for me the functionality of a  
>> somewhat rare model of m6 and a complicated conversion job on a  
>> long-discontinued model.  Again, I am not a working professional  
>> (in photography) but this does not necessarily invalidate those  
>> things I appreciate in a fine camera. And the mp embodied many of  
>> those virtues.
>>
>> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 9:46 am, Walt Johnson wrote:
>> ... Time will tell, but look at the Leitz shenanigans just in the  
>> last few years.  From M6 to M6TTl to M7 and then back to the M3 or  
>> was that MP? Marketing nonsense, not tools for working professionals.
>> -rei
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)