Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Tue Nov 7 09:57:11 2006
References: <00c401c70155$4d761260$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <454EB466.3090205@eth.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061106070325.024ecdb0@infoave.net> <454FDF93.7050900@eth.net> <455097CF.7000707@waltjohnson.com> <1162917166.2A4A8DF3@fd5.dngr.org>

Rei
I don't think MPs were snake oil and if I didn't have M3s and M6s my 
choice would be an MP. It looked to me as if the company saw some of 
their marketing errors and hoped to regroup with a mechanical camera. If 
I wanted an automated camera it would be a Nikon or Canon. Personally, I 
prefer the M6 and the idea of changing dial designs (M6TTL) seemed 
idiotic. The years I spent shooting professionally convinced me of a few 
"golden rules". One of the most important is to keep the equipment I 
carry the same. Same bodies, different focal lengths. I don't  even want 
to look at the settings while shooting but dial them by feel.

As far as not working professionally, there are some misconceptions 
about that. Anyone can use a camera and learn to do it well. I even 
doctor myself from time to time without ill effects. If you are doing 
something which excites you that is what counts. If you are doing an 
assignment for a national magazine even cow poop photos must look good. 
That is the biggest difference.

Walt

p.s Recently has surgery and reluctantly let the doctor do it. :-)

Rei Shinozuka wrote:

> I am no working professional, but I would like to defend the mp as 
> more than marketing snake-oil.  Prior to the mp, my favorite camera 
> was the m6 0.85 and I also had an m3 upgraded to m6-style loading.  In 
> short, the mp contained for me the functionality of a somewhat rare 
> model of m6 and a complicated conversion job on a long-discontinued 
> model.  Again, I am not a working professional (in photography) but 
> this does not necessarily invalidate those things I appreciate in a 
> fine camera. And the mp embodied many of those virtues.
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 9:46 am, Walt Johnson wrote:
> ... Time will tell, but look at the Leitz shenanigans just in the last 
> few years.  From M6 to M6TTl to M7 and then back to the M3 or was that 
> MP? Marketing nonsense, not tools for working professionals.
> -rei
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 2500 ISO (or less))
Reply from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)