Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alex Hurst wrote: >"FWIW, this would seem to be a variation on the Nikon CRC system which >optimizes focus in close." You may be on to something, Alex, because the 85/2 ZM Sonnar does employ floating elements, which is exactly what Nikon's CRC design does. In the CRC (close range correction) system, these 'floating" elements move within the lens as the focus distance changes. The ZM 85/2.8 also "incorporates an ultra-precise, nonlinear RF coupling mechanism" paired with the floating element design. Nikon uses its CRC system not only with medium telephoto lenses but also with extreme wide angle lenses, where such focus problems & resultant image deterioration also occur. Sure enough, the new 15/2.8 ZM Distagon employs a floating element design as well. These are the 2 new Zeiss lenses that will be manufactured directly by Zeiss in Germany & have not been subcontracted to Cosina because of their lack of experience & equipment necessary for this type of lens manufacture. I wonder if they are also using something similar or equivalent to Nikon's ED glass, which they employ especially on their ultra-wide angle optics. Zeiss too stresses in its literature the use of "exotic optical materials"* in the manufacure of the 15/2.8. It's interesting to note as well that Nikon lenses using ED glass also employ special focusing mechanics to accomodate "a shift in the focus point" (from "The Nikon Compendium"). For Nikon, too, these are among their most expensive lenses "due to the unusually high manufacturing costs involved in the production of ED lenses." Funny thing is that no one called it "hype" when Nikon introduced the CRC system. What is the resistance to this new Zeiss product line that prompts such comments?