Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 4:23 PM +0000 1/10/05, Alex Hurst wrote: >Bill wrote in part: > >>So, it would seem that the primary beneficiary of this correction >>will be the 85/2 Sonnar, which I would expect that purchasers of >>this lens will appreciate since it is the highest priced pony in >>the stable. At the announced price, this clientele would more >>likely be professionals involved in portraiture for whom such >>critical differences are more likely to be a factor. >> > >FWIW, this would seem to be a variation on the Nikon CRC system >which optimises focusing in close. My 85/1.4 Nikkor was apparently >one of the first short teles to have it. Nikon also use it on a >number of other fast lenses. > >Best > >Alex >-- >Alex Hurst >Waterfall >Nr. Cork >Ireland The Nikon CRC system (otherwise known as 'floating elements') is aimed at correcting other problems than focus shift. The floating elements stay in the same relative positions when the aperture is changed, but move when the focussing distance is changed. The floating element feature corrects for the fact that all lens configurations are at their optimum at one reproduction ration only, and performance falls off at others. The focus shift issue is mostly due to spherical aberration, as has been noted in a previous post. Current ASPH Leica lenses have about as little of this as any lenses of their focal length and general design, so it is not an issue anymore. The 90AA would be very hard to match, let alone beat in this regard. I would be surprised if the 85/2 Zeiss lens performs better, and if it does, whether anyone can tell. :-) The 75/1.4 has _very_ slight focus shift; certainly less than any tolerances introduced in a practical shooting situation. It has more undercorrected spherical aberration, and thus also nicer bokeh. The older Summicron 90's had more focus shift (and spherical aberration), but this was somewhat hard to tell as they were not super sharp wide open, and so the exact focus point was often hard to tell. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com