Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The topic of focus shift in relation to the Zeiss Ikon was raised over the weekend. So, I did some research & came up with the following explanation from Zeiss Ikon: "One major challenge for all lens designs is to correct for spherical aberrations. The larger the largest opening is, obviously the more problems to correct over the entire aperture range. f/2-f/2.8 lenses have always a potential focus shift which can cause problems. "Normally the approach is to use the widest opening as the "correct focus" position and accept that when stopping down the position of best focus is changing (also the depth-of-field is increasing). However, for longer lenses this can be recognized as a visible shift of best focusing point. The typical situation is for a portrait when you know that you made your focusing on the eye, but the sharpest parts in the picture are on the ears. Irritating even if the eye is fairly sharp. But depth-of-field is not the same as very good sharpness. "The ZI lenses have been designed for eliminating this effect. The result is an even higher performance at stopped-down apertures, where you normally use the lens. At full aperture (where lenses are normally tested & judged) you would see a smaller difference between designs with & without significant aperture dependant focus shift." So, it would seem that the primary beneficiary of this correction will be the 85/2 Sonnar, which I would expect that purchasers of this lens will appreciate since it is the highest priced pony in the stable. At the announced price, this clientele would more likely be professionals involved in portraiture for whom such critical differences are more likely to be a factor.