Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A Leica Q3 in India from a dealer costs 4.25 times a Fuji X100V, 3.25 times a Nikon Z7 II, 2.5 times a Nikon Z8 and 1.75 times a Nikon Z9. Hardly a compelling buy, even for the most diehard cultist! Cheers Jayanand On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:14?PM Frank Filippone via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > Part of being in a cult is to accept all things cult..... and for Leica, > that means NOTHING is better than an M3. If it does not look like an M3 > (M5) it is no good. If it has one dimension different than an M3 (M240) > it is no good. If it does not use a 24x36 sensor (M8) it is no good. > > II just read about the newest member of the team of no good > Leicas....M11. Why? Because it does not have a removable base > plate..... Like the M3. > > > On 3/5/2024 9:09 PM, Mark Kronquist via LUG wrote: > > As with all things in this cult called Leica (which I gleefully belong > to) the 24MP M240 (et al) seems to be the unloved step child of the line > (at the moment (but then so was the M8 until i wrote that unfortunate > because I have only one $500 one article about the M8 and IR and M8 and > Monochrome for LHSA et al?and before the M9 was tied to Paul Simon > Kodachrome cult song?.the (disdained video ick well don?t use it), 2mm > thicker (really) returned awesoem images (instagram kronquistm) and is two > models behind the times (really M10/p use same sensor) thus trash and well > no Leica is cheap?but affordable? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > Seehttp://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- > Frank Filippone > BMWRed735i at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information