Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]+ a lot :-) :-) Peter On 06/03/2024 15:44, Frank Filippone via LUG wrote: > Part of being in a cult is to accept all things cult..... and for Leica, > that means NOTHING is better than an M3.? If it does not look like an M3 > (M5) it is no good.? If it has one dimension different than an M3 (M240) > it is no good.? If it does not use a 24x36 sensor (M8) it is no good. > > II just read about the newest member of the team of no good > Leicas....M11.? Why? Because it does not have a removable base > plate.....? Like the M3. > > > On 3/5/2024 9:09 PM, Mark Kronquist via LUG wrote: >> As with all things in this cult called Leica (which I gleefully belong >> to) the 24MP M240 (et al) seems to be the unloved step child of the >> line (at the moment (but then so was the M8 until i wrote that >> unfortunate because I have only one $500 one article about the M8 and >> IR and M8 and Monochrome for LHSA et al?and before the M9 was tied to >> Paul Simon Kodachrome cult song?.the (disdained video ick well don?t >> use it), 2mm thicker (really) returned awesoem images (instagram >> kronquistm) and is two models behind the times (really M10/p use same >> sensor) thus trash and well no Leica is cheap?but affordable? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> Seehttp://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug? for more information > -- Dr. Peter Dzwig