Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc)
From: jhandsfield at att.net (JAMES HANDSFIELD)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 06:52:56 -0500
References: <d2120601-b6fa-4538-907b-a7755874603c@iol.ie> <D9395AAC-19C1-4F8C-B84C-19EAAC81AD0F@teleport.com> <6beb1a61-ab52-4d5a-a577-f8d639d82722@gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ3TocGZxjDKPPKfsWofTgt9VbCj=scD1Fx_H4buzU1M7Q@mail.gmail.com>

If seriously considering a Q3, check out Leica Store Manchester (England).  
Because of pricing policy and exchange rates, the end cost in the US is 
several hundred dollars under the US price.  I purchased both my M11 bodies 
from them and saved almost $1,000 each.

Jim Handsfield
jhandsfield at att.net

?Thou shalt not commit nincompoopery.?
? Carl Sandburg






> On Mar 6, 2024, at 9:47?PM, Jayanand Govindaraj via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> A Leica Q3 in India from a dealer costs 4.25 times a Fuji X100V, 3.25 times
> a Nikon Z7 II, 2.5 times a Nikon Z8 and 1.75 times a Nikon Z9.
> 
> Hardly a compelling buy, even for the most diehard cultist!
> 
> Cheers
> Jayanand



In reply to: Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Faux Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))