Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/05/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Selling for the S
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 14:42:11 -0700
References: <36B08DA9-3BC5-46D6-ABF1-58B236C3A589@gmail.com> <CAF8hL-FhxGGcY-2=ZbKUzV2pV3B1-=yaT6N3BueM=bgvc9zOQg@mail.gmail.com> <F658C116-CC95-46B1-AD3B-1C7C61583495@gmail.com> <CA+yJO1C64aBkTA468FdWOYwwx1v_c1kUwcdcEhX+cJDc_hVFFA@mail.gmail.com> <EF975093-7ACE-43AD-8A15-1BD07F4880F9@gmail.com> <CE7033FA-E06C-410B-ACD4-16840CFBDFFD@gmail.com> <B58BD5B3-901C-4534-BB71-001D93939083@gmail.com>

Well I'll always trust an actual user over some lab tester!

Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com

> On May 6, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I disagree! I think low light performance is much better with SL!
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On May 6, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Tina. I found this and thought it was helpful:
>> http://cameradecision.com/compare/Leica-M-Typ-240-vs-Leica-SL
>> though not as helpful as talking with you!
>> 
>> I am a bit confused where they say the 240 does better in low light, but 
>> the SL has higher ISO. Not sure how to interpret their low light 
>> performance numbers.
>> Thanks,
>> Bob
>> 
>> Bob Adler
>> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>> 
>>> On May 6, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Bob, 
>>> 
>>> Are you not considering the M10?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Leo Wesson
>>> Leowesson.com
>>> 817-733-9157
>>> 
>>>> On May 6, 2017, at 11:29, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> If you Google M240 sensor compared to SL sensor, you will get lots of
>>>> comparisons.  Ditto with M lenses on both.
>>>> 
>>>> Good luck!
>>>> 
>>>> Tina
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Desire the zooms for travel...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bob Adler
>>>>> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 5, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
>>>>>> richardmanphoto.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't have the SL, nor even the M240, but is "image quality, vs the
>>>>> M240,
>>>>>> significantly improved with M lenses" to be your primary objective? If
>>>>> so,
>>>>>> I can't imagine how the SL would be significantly better than the M240
>>>>> with
>>>>>> M lens.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm contemplating selling some gear (M240, M21mm/1,4 ASPH, Sony A7r 
>>>>>>> II
>>>>>>> modified by Kolarivision for Leica WA lenses) plus some cash for an 
>>>>>>> SL
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> the 24-90.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Two questions:
>>>>>>> 1. Given a large collection of recent generation M lenses, are there 
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> known issues? MINOR degradation at the corners of images made with WA
>>>>>>> lenses used wide open are not a big deal to me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2. Is there a noticeable positive difference in raw files? What
>>>>>>> differences (positive or negative).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bottom line, is the image quality, vs the M240, significantly 
>>>>>>> improved
>>>>>>> with M lenses to warrant this move? Not really talking about the
>>>>>>> differences in how one works with the two systems.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your input,
>>>>>>> Bob
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bob Adler
>>>>>>> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "Some People Drive, We Are Driven"
>>>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>>>>> richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram
>>>>>> <https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Tina Manley
>>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>>>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Selling for the SL)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Selling for the SL)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Selling for the SL)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Selling for the SL)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] Selling for the SL)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Selling for the SL)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Selling for the S)