Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought they were about the same. I've gone with the D3s. People told me it was big, but I can still handle the R9DMR, so I figured I'd give it a go. Alastair > Vick, > > It is actually slightly lighter than a Nikon D3S. However the size is > about the same. > > Cheers, > Gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vick Ko" <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 7:33:48 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [Leica] Sensibility of keeping "overlapping" lenses > > Yeah, this was all an experiment. > > I knew from owning an SL2 that Leica R was pretty hefty. But the DMR/R9 > set is a bit over the top for me. > > I never went the Canon nor Nikon DSLR route, and after reading about the > incompatibilities, don't really want to. > > ...Vick > > > > On 4/12/2011 4:44 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> How about why did you buy them in the first place? >> You didn't know R stuff was big? >> >> >> -------------------- >> Mark William Rabiner > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >