Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Sensibility of keeping "overlapping" lenses
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:59:37 -0500 (CDT)
 
Vick,

It is actually slightly lighter than a Nikon D3S.  However the size is about 
the same.

Cheers,
Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vick Ko" <vick.ko at sympatico.ca>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 7:33:48 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [Leica] Sensibility of keeping "overlapping" lenses

Yeah, this was all an experiment.

I knew from owning an SL2 that Leica R was pretty hefty.  But the DMR/R9 
set is a bit over the top for me.

I never went the Canon nor Nikon DSLR route, and after reading about the 
incompatibilities, don't really want to.

...Vick



On 4/12/2011 4:44 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> How about why did you buy them in the first place?
> You didn't know R stuff was big?
>
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] Sensibility of keeping "overlapping" lenses)
 In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Sensibility of keeping "overlapping" lenses)