Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Philippe, Rabs put it this way: "it's a medium format camera in a 35mm package. Delight in its deceptiveness." S2 has an f/2.5 lens vs the M's f/1.4 (or f/1.0 or even f/.95) and is slower due to the larger image circle. The S2 sensor is 45x30mm and the M's is 36x24mm. Maybe it is not correct, but I was thinking of a projector as an analog, move it farther from the screen and the image is bigger, but darker. Twice the diagonal size, 1/4 the brightness as the lamp has to illuminate the equivalent of four of the original images. Makes me think of the Meno. John philippe.amard wrote: > > Le 20 mars 10 ? 22:25, John Nebel a ?crit : > >> Taken literally that doesn't make much sense; I should have said >> something like it is lot hungrier for light than a 35mm. >> >> Expected, given a slower lens spreading the rays out over a bigger >> area, but initially surprising with a camera that looks like an R8. >> Looks aren't everything. >> > Could you be more explicit if you have time to, curious minds want to > understand. > TIA > Philippe > > >> John > > > NO ARCHIVE > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information