Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM
From: taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:14:01 +1000
References: <C7B02E86.5E645%mark@rabinergroup.com> <09EF8B34-D7BA-4B41-AF89-9E255A06D146@mac.com> <3cad89991002281917g3dd52fccld14d33f55f98e25c@mail.gmail.com> <D339377E-7452-400A-9F06-0DC2A5DFE800@mac.com> <b530ac231002282201m1493c9b3h80c8ce0718c76449@mail.gmail.com> <43E0E15F-F01C-464E-A9FE-FD962C755610@mac.com>

Interestingly enough, the Nikon D3X supposedly can capture a greater DR than
the p1 p65 across the board...

On 1 March 2010 16:19, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:

> Not necessarily.
> It can also mean more useable shadow detail
> providing greater dynamic range (DR)
> at optimized ISO ratings.
>
> Which is what I see when comparing
> 5D files with M8 and DMR files.
>
> Yet the 5D delivers better high ISO performance.
>
> I'm not aware of any CCD camera or back
> that can deliver the useable high ISO that current DSLR Cmos sensors do.
>
> Yet the CCDs deliver the micro detail and dynamic range
> better than the Cmos at low to medium ISO.
>
> As far as I know the astronomical and scientific applications
> continue to prefer using CCDs for their ability to record detail and DR.
>
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Daniel Tan wrote:
>
>  Hmmmmm...
>> A better SNR implies better high iso characteristics...
>>
>> :Daniel
>>
>> On 1 March 2010 15:49, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>  That is also my understanding Jayanand.
>>> CCD:
>>> Better S:N (signal to noise) characteristics.
>>> Greater dynamic range.
>>> Greater ability to render micro detail.
>>> More expensive to produce.
>>> Requires more processing power.
>>>
>>> Cmos:
>>> Higher ISO performance.
>>> On board processors resulting in less power usage.
>>> Lower Cost.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>>>
>>>  If I remember right, CCD sensors have better noise characteristics than
>>>
>>>> CMOS
>>>> ones. The major  advantages of CMOS sensors are considerably lower power
>>>> usage and lower manufacturing costs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Daniel Tan
Taniel.Dan at gmail.com


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)