Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:49:29 -0600
References: <C7B02E86.5E645%mark@rabinergroup.com> <09EF8B34-D7BA-4B41-AF89-9E255A06D146@mac.com> <3cad89991002281917g3dd52fccld14d33f55f98e25c@mail.gmail.com>

That is also my understanding Jayanand.
CCD:
Better S:N (signal to noise) characteristics.
Greater dynamic range.
Greater ability to render micro detail.
More expensive to produce.
Requires more processing power.

Cmos:
Higher ISO performance.
On board processors resulting in less power usage.
Lower Cost.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Feb 28, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:

> If I remember right, CCD sensors have better noise characteristics  
> than CMOS
> ones. The major  advantages of CMOS sensors are considerably lower  
> power
> usage and lower manufacturing costs.



Replies: Reply from taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)