Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9, lag time, perception and other things
From: bamboozld at gmail.com (K Landdeck)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:15:48 -0800
References: <mailman.828.1264667339.73134.lug@leica-users.org> <SNT121-DS228C69F054DBDBF648846DD45C0@phx.gbl> <ee8fa51c1001281525u7ba06c40r354e714788ec8285@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f1001281538t5acd9c8cn2d3b37be043d2c1b@mail.gmail.com>

Funny, when I saw the question about how long 0.08 of a second is, I  
thought to myself, "Probably about the time it would take for the  
puddle-jumping man in HCB's famous photo to have splashed down instead  
of being caught mid-air!"  Timing is everything.  :-)

=============
Only connect.
=============
my photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shudaizi/

bamboozld at gmail.com









On Jan 28, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> To tie it to the other threads, wonder how the shutter lag would
> affect HCB. Would it be simply a matter of "anticipating earlier" or
> would it just missed opportunities?
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>>
>> 0.08 s is about 1/13 s - much longer than most exposures.
>>
>> Later,
>>
>> Marty
>>
>
> -- 
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // portfolio: 
> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/AnotherCalifornia 
> >
> blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com
> // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] M9, lag time, perception and other things)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] M9, lag time, perception and other things)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9, lag time, perception and other things)