Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You people are unbelievable. Of course Doug can take world winning pictures with a coke bottom lens :-) The claims were that Leica lens is so much better, it makes your pictures +100% Then I said, well, for most mortals, we don't NEED Leica lens, except for few like Doug and Tina etc. Now you guys are picking on that I used Doug as an example :-) Look, lets leave Doug alone. He is great. Regardless. My position still stands, most of us don't NEED Leica lens, but most of us WANTS Leica lens. No apology needed. On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote: > I feel that Doug's quality of photographs is due to his skill - the > equipment matters to the extent that he 'mates' with it for the > photography to be seamless. I have seen examples of this at work - > Doug with Leica, John Shaw with Nikon, Darrel Gulin with Canon, the > list is endless. > Cheers > Jayanand > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> > wrote: > ?Now, for Doug Herr, that's a different >> story. His fowl pictures get their sharpness and characteristic from >> the Leica lens. Most other mortals? Nah. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963