Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] LTM versus M
From: marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Wed Feb 18 07:01:59 2009
References: <200902170300.n1H30IaS007669@server1.waverley.reid.org> <7875AF61-89CE-4F46-B685-BFE10DE1B82D@optonline.net> <36172e5a0902162241h19c3de47h7b79ac76190bf796@mail.gmail.com> <8D555D84-5209-44D9-B16F-FA733180E6E6@teleport.com> <36172e5a0902170003oee34f08rbf6cce8f36127102@mail.gmail.com> <499A8B7A.9080904@gmx.de> <584FA2308FEB4DC3B8CB62C87B4BBC61@precisionm50> <20090217205730.D927E15B316@barracuda.rutabaga.org> <1B9DE074-7785-4FE4-9C9C-D5E087D43959@frozenlight.eu>
At 04:55 PM 2/17/2009, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>Well yes, but the person who asked actually has both an M and an LTM
>body, so he has no reason to force himself to use the inferior tool.
?????
Marc
msmall@aya.yale.edu
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from leica at web-options.com (Bob W) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] LTM versus M)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] LTM versus M)