Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Doug Herr posted the following perspective: > bob palmieri wrote: > >> Sometimes I think that I just do this stuff to sharpen my hunting >> skills, in case I actually need to shoot something of real value. > > YES absolutely. > >> Could be one of those midlife things, but having some control of the >> elements of visual vocabulary was supposed to be an intermediate >> step, and I'm feeling like the next step is gonna involve a lot of >> personal work to figure out if I have anything I really want to say >> with shooting. > > Recognizing this as an intermediate step is a vital part of the > process. > Lots and lots of photographers (and other creative types) never get > beyond > this step - it's often called being stuck in a rut. Reaching > beyond this > step is risky: you risk making mistakes, losing your fan base, and > floundering for a while (if not forever). It's re-inventing yourself. That "if not forever" part is what has me scared... > > I often feel like I'm in a rut. A good rut, but I'd like to go beyond > where I am. Trying new techniques (i.e., the kayak) is part of the > process > but so far I don't feel like the results I've been getting are > visually > distinct from the photographs I was making two or three years ago. > I don't > want to just refine my work, I want to re-invent it. Does this > make sense? Jeez... do you ever get it!