Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] un-believable
From: mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi)
Date: Fri Dec 19 18:05:32 2008
References: <C4BF7AB3-DB7F-43A5-9A3A-62AFC042AE67@mac.com> <20081219185359.04b33c1a@linux-019a.site> <0DA7A328-EA7B-486C-935A-38EB0A012C8C@ameritech.net> <BD27E035DFBE447E84496BA54E55A369@D1S9FY41> <494C3CC0.2010707@gmail.com> <a3f189160812191637j16bef191oc3934155177ca856@mail.gmail.com> <494C4109.7060208@gmail.com> <a3f189160812191706r4aac349cu9b43e9681410bbfd@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0812191729r601e6c42qeac4db5000afa418@mail.gmail.com> <F6C9D9FE-4ED0-4874-9030-564FB8989EE0@mac.com>

I should just start saving up for an M8, I guess. :)

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com>wrote:

> when on a limited budget
> it's all about choices
> I sold stuff that would rather not have
> to get the M8
> no regrets
> yet would love to still have
> some of the stuff I had to sell
> choices
>
> I'm one of those that can't have it all
>
> Fond regards,
> George
>
> george@imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>
>  I'd love to have an M8! I love the rangefinder. I don't know how low they
>> should be charging. All I know is that I can't afford the M8 for $4500
>> then,
>> and not $3000 now (#$$%^& economy), and certainly not $5000-$6000 or
>> whatever it is for the M8.2.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Yama Nawabi <mknawabi.lug@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   I just don't agree with how much they're charging for it. I understand
>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>> M8 is hand-built and the RF mechanism is expensive, but I am a firm
>>>>
>>> believer
>>>
>>>> that it could have been a lot better under different guidance.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Or a lot different. I happen to like what it turned out to be.
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
>> // b: http://richardfman.wordpress.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)