Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 13/12/2008, at 21:51, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > I bought computers before I had ever heard of digital photography, > and I would continue to buy a new computer every few years even if I > gave up photography tomorrow. So to count the cost of the computer > as part of the cost of photography is nonsense. That will not deter the fact that you will need one to use the product of your photography, that's not like throwing stones in a pond where you just need three things all of them usually free. I don't want get into running in circles, I understand your reasoning, and makes sense, but I do look at it as chained happenings, the cost may be filed under A, B or C, but if all the three requires a facility to work, and you do all the three, to me is clear that it's a split charge no matter what is the primary task. I feel better, to hell with photography, art, women, and all E. Weston, 1924 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- http://luis.imaginarymagnitude.net/