Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] David and confused
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Thu Dec 4 07:12:36 2008
References: <49358D3E.1080608@tele2.fr> <C55CC148.45EAD%mark@rabinergroup.com> <63E2EC3CE1114C30BEA85ECFAF155031@dadquad>

So I suppose there is little argument even for B&W film any more.  Perhaps 
the randomness and approximation of the traditional methods will remain a 
strength for some.


At 11:24 PM 12/3/2008, you wrote:
>YES!! Someone else gets it!
>Even better, when you get to Raw files in CS4 there is even more
>functionality (for colour and BW) in the form of adjustment brushes and
>targeted adjustments and snapshots that let you save all of the development
>settings and new camera profiles and... Oh just try it out if you want a
>good insight. You can get a 30 day trial from Adobe, I'm sure. Check out
>some of the Adobe tutorials too.
>Absolutely compose and visualize the photo as a BW from the start, if that's
>how you prefer to work, that makes perfect sense when you've seen patterns
>and contrast and textures, shapes etc that you know will make a great BW
>shot. Just capture all of the colour information that gives you the
>possibilities to do all of the above and a lot more. You can easily use
>combinations to simulate a specific film too, if you want.
>
>
>Cheers
>Geoff
>http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Subject: Re: [Leica] David and confused
>
>The issue to me is that doing black and white is not a mouse click away.
>Its a lot more hands on involved than that.
>The mouse click away indicated you've just changed it into grayscale like in
>Photoshop 4 or 5 a few years ago.
>
>And now you open up a file in CS3 or I assume CS4 I've not quite got yet and
>you've got an HSL/Greyscale panel with 8 color sliders on it with presets
>and things you can load in and or save. As you're working these sliders and
>preset you see the various elements in your image, the sky the foliage the
>bricks change as you do it. So things are separated out they way you want
>them to be. The way you'd never get them to be in a million  years shooting
>film.
>
>Or you can open it up in full color.
>Go into the menu adjustments / Black and White.
>Here you've got the color sliders again but much better set up presets.
>particularly
>Green filter,
>Infrared
>red filter,  yellow filter
>High contrast red filter.
>
>After you hit a preset you can then tweak the 8 color sliders till your
>picture is filtered perfectly.
>
>Its like dying and going to heaven.
>A black and white photographers dream come true.
>
>And the bad part is....
>There is no bad part.
>
>
>
>
>mark@rabinergroup.com
>Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
> > From: Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard@tele2.fr>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:32:14 +0100
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Daved and confused
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> > I understand your qualms.
> > In many ways, your own brains decide. BW or colour, who cares so long
> > as you still decide what pleases you better.
> > Yet, everything starts with visualisation; light, shapes, people,
> > places, etc - the rest is only technology, i.e. immaterial and can be
> > changed, at any time.
> > It also ends up with you, you seeing what has come of your endeavour,
> > and often another person visualising your end product - and this is
> > also what matters.
> > I am unsure the subject can be tackled differently, in photographic
> > terms I mean.
> > So no qualms - visualise, shoot, make the most of the neg/file/0 and1s
> > to your taste, and please our eyes with beautiful never seen before,
> > and never to be seen again photographs.
> > Bien amicalement.
> > Philippe
> >
> > David Rodgers wrote:
> >
> >> Perhaps this is too deep a subject for a shallow mind such as mine,
> >> but when I first learned photography I was taught that visualization
> >> -- the process of imagining the final print before snapping the
> >> shutter -- was essential to good photography. It was difficult, but
> >> made a little easier because your scope of visualization was more
> >> narrow. For instance, you were pretty much locked into the type of
> >> film you were using.
> >>
> >> Certainly you could cross over from BW to color using Marshall Oils
> >> or the opposite direction using Panalure, but how common was it to do
> >> so? I think I used Marshall Oils one time and I still have leftovers
> >> from my first and only box of Panalure.
> >>
> >> Now we can switch back and forth -- and I do it often, from color to
> >> BW and back, at least -- with a mouse click. Since nearly all digital
> >> begins in color (I'm not diciplined enough to shoot in monochrome
> >> mode) it's almost like I'm admitting defeat when I determine that an
> >> image can't make it as a color image so I try and dress it up a little 
> >> in
>BW.
> >>
> >> Thus when I shoot digital I feel like I'm a color photographer who
> >> uses BW -- aka zero saturation -- as a crutch to make bad photos that
> >> have some compositional merit but are colorly challenged, into
> >> mediocre photos; sometimes even really good BW photos, if I'm lucky.
> >> I can even hide unwanted artifacts....even noise.
> >>
> >> Has happenstance replaced visualization? Is this even something worth
> >> discussing? WWAS? (What would Ansel say?) Was visualization merely a
> >> fancy metaphore for "you're stuck with what's in your camera, so make
> >> the most of it".
> >>
> >> There was a day when I'd have given my eye teeth to have someone come
> >> up to me and offer a magic film that could be either color or BW at
> >> the snap of my finger. After all, visualization was a tough thing for
> >> me to grasp. Sadly, now that I'm an old dog I can't ungrasp it. I'm
> >> conflicted and confused. What's that old saying? Careful what you wish
>for.....
> >>
> >> DaveR
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Chris Saganich MS, CPH
Senior Physicist, Office of Health Physics
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
chs2018@med.cornell.edu
http://intranet.med.cornell.edu/research/health_phys/
Ph. 212.746.6964
Fax. 212.746.4800
Office A-0049








"I am the radiation"  

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] David and confused)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Daved and confused)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] David and confused)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] David and confused)