Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] lens choice?
From: simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun)
Date: Mon Dec 1 03:04:16 2008
References: <7au4gf$11qg2r@pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca> <4931A931.5040706@runbox.com> <4931B53F.5010705@san.rr.com> <4931C6F8.1020304@runbox.com> <49331A33.7070807@san.rr.com> <4933287A.80906@runbox.com> <20081130205527.3f0f74be@linux-019a.site>

For me it was the amazing new 70mm lens.
simon jessurun

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Philip Forrest
<photo.forrest@earthlink.net>wrote:

> Disregarding brand and stripe (Leica vs. Canon vs. Nikon vs. Zeiss) if
> you had to pick one lens for daily use on your rangefinder and it was
> either a 35mm f/2.0 or a 50mm f/1.4 which would it be? (or digital
> equivalent for y'all working in 1's and 0's)
> I ask since they are both within the "normal" range for rangefinder
> shooters and often a question we have to face. I hate carrying a lot of
> equipment and refuse to carry redundant equipment of which I consider
> the 35 and 50mm lenses I own (excluding my DR Summicron).
> Just throwing this out there to see the opinions which will come
> through.
>
> Phil Forrest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Gun Photos)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Gun Photos)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Gun Photos)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Gun Photos)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Gun Photos)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Gun Photos)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] lens choice?)