Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M8 problems
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Thu Aug 30 03:54:55 2007
References: <200708292210.l7TM9rZX034812@server1.waverley.reid.org> <3FB3F9B3-2C71-4366-9A36-B636EDF9B351@optonline.net> <a3f189160708291843p3e91de35wf53f3398532aff29@mail.gmail.com> <01d001c7eaaa$b2a053a0$17e0fae0$@net>

My M8 at 160 iso is better than my scans from my Kodachrome 64 slides  
taken on my M6.
Frank

On 30 Aug, 2007, at 03:08, Frank Filippone wrote:

> What about at ASA ( ISO) 100-400?  Is the M8 still superior?
>
> Do you shoot Velvia?  How does the M8 compare to Velvia 100F?   
> Provia 200 or
> 400?
>
> If you are a B+W shooter, try TMAX100 or Ilford PanF ( ASA 100)......?
>
> I could go on, but not all of us shoot grainy high ASA films.  How  
> does the
> M8 compare to these really good films?  All I have heard about is  
> the fast
> stuff.......
>
> Frank Filippone
>
>
> My  m8 images at  medium high ISO are superior to my images on
> Fuji 400-800-1600.
>
> Sonny
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)