Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: M8 problems
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed Aug 29 19:08:52 2007
References: <200708292210.l7TM9rZX034812@server1.waverley.reid.org> <3FB3F9B3-2C71-4366-9A36-B636EDF9B351@optonline.net> <a3f189160708291843p3e91de35wf53f3398532aff29@mail.gmail.com>
What about at ASA ( ISO) 100-400? Is the M8 still superior?
Do you shoot Velvia? How does the M8 compare to Velvia 100F? Provia 200 or
400?
If you are a B+W shooter, try TMAX100 or Ilford PanF ( ASA 100)......?
I could go on, but not all of us shoot grainy high ASA films. How does the
M8 compare to these really good films? All I have heard about is the fast
stuff.......
Frank Filippone
My m8 images at medium high ISO are superior to my images on
Fuji 400-800-1600.
Sonny
Replies:
Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)