Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chris, Stunning work -- mostly attributed to the fine print, or to the lens... How close are you to those toes? I just bought the viso iii, so that's done -- I think the blk 65 is preferred. Thanks. Pete On 8/17/07, Chris Saganich <chs2018@med.cornell.edu> wrote: > > > I'm one of those folks who like the viso and take it out with me when I > think I'll be in some good macro situations. Here are some examples of > the > Black 65 on a viso II (which is my perference) on my MP hand held in > available light from infinity to as close as it will go without additional > extension. One handy feature of the black version is you can open the > aperture all the way to focus and then close it down to whatever stop you > were using without taking your face from the finder. The lens has above > average contrast which is a bitch for some B&W but once you get the hang > of > exposure and development the added resolution is a great asset. The > images > below are triX processed in straight D23 which by definition is low > actuance. Having enlarged at least one of these images (the giant leaf) > to > 16x20 I was impressed by the definition which remained despite being hand > held in low light at full magnification. > > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs045.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs046.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs047.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs048.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs049.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs050.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs051.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs052.htm > http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs056.htm > > > Chris S > > At 04:59 PM 8/16/2007, you wrote: > >There is a big difference in the performance of the chrome and later > black > >65mm Elmar lenses. The chrome version is a low contrast lens that gives > a > >pastel like performance that is charming in a way. The black Elmar is a > >high contrast lens with much improved resolution. It is one of my > >favorite lenses, and is great on the viso or R bellows. The performance > >on the edges is not the best at infinity, but the lens is designed for > >close-up work, and is a delight in this range. Erwin Putz does not > >consider either of these lenses as being exceptional performers, and > makes > >a comment that the Elmar design is not optimum for macro work. I don't > >agree with him on this in regard to the performance of the black > >version. I might also add that the 100mm f4 macro Elmer for the Leica R > >series cameras is also a classical Elmar design, and it performs quite > >well both in near and far distances. > > > >Ferrel Anderson > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Leica Users Group. > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >