Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica digital M...
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Tue May 16 23:22:30 2006
References: <A9DB04C8-243B-4B44-A1DC-226313EE06CB@cox.net> <9b678e0605151929v32b51159o18132fd6faf3098f@mail.gmail.com> <311CF1B3-9374-407C-BE96-EBD500405EB2@cox.net> <9b678e0605161808k740f9368ncd46b897dd5b1e7e@mail.gmail.com> <FC1999AB-54DA-4BE5-9E2E-DEADB7ADEEA2@mac.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20060516202050.08cda210@192.168.100.42> <95FCD3E3-DDC0-4BCC-B4B3-6572228B1D34@mac.com>

Heh, notice I didn't say digital M *BACK* for existing Ms. I think it will 
be digital M rangefinder body. Whether the sensor module can be upgraded or 
not... I don't know. I wouldn't bet on it.

As for whether anyone will buy it for $5K, obviously Leica thinks so, and I 
would agree with them. A 10MP, 1.33x crop digital camera for $5K is 
expensive, but then again, so is a film camera for $2K (2003 M6) and $3.5K 
(2006 M7/MP). Leica is not into mass market.

Anyone who thinks Leica is making all these "lousy" business decisions 
should remember that against all odds, Leica camera still exists and still 
selling cameras. I know some people (say with initial B and D :-) ) will 
say, "but not for long!" But I say, lets wait and see. The Fat Lady is not 
singing yet...

At 08:56 PM 5/16/2006, Robert Schneider wrote:
>...
>Of course I don't know, but probably not more than a year ago the
>resident digital experts said it was impossible.
>
>It's a solution that would keep a whole lot of existing cameras
>clicking, not that that's really Leica's concern.  But considering
>Leica's precarious financial status, it seems to me that selling a
>bunch of replaceable/upgradeable $2,000 to $3,000 digital M modules
>makes more sense than trying to sell a $5,000 digital rangefinder
>camera body that verges on obsolete on release.
>
>Granted there are Leica users here and elsewhere who will buy a
>digital M sight unseen as soon as it's available.  But how many?  Two
>thousand?  Would that really be enough to cover the R&D on such an item?
>
>rs

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)
Message from schneiderpix at mac.com (Robert Schneider) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)
Message from schneiderpix at mac.com (Robert Schneider) ([Leica] Leica digital M...)