Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 2006 PAW Wk8
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Tue Feb 28 08:15:58 2006
References: <189EE4B3-F61D-49EB-9EC9-17F185BF0656@pandora.be>

Philippe - The on-line image looks quite noiseless.   Does it look 
good in 8x10 or 16x20?  Does Neat Image do a better job than Noise 
Ninja?


>o Wk7. Much professional work and a new light meter didn't get me 
>further than test shots unworthy of presenting. But they got me 
>acquainted to the different spot metering representation of the 
>Sekonic L-558 than my old Pentax V.
>Wk8 is a shot of a domestic scene with the Digilux 2 at 400 ASA. I 
>just installed NeatImage and made some noise profiles for the RAW 
>formats at different speeds and wanted to test them (testing again, 
>yes, it's that time of the year :-) on a real shot. It seems to work:
>
>http://www.fullflavor.be/photography/PAW2006/slides/Wk8.html
>
>Comments appreciated and
>Thanks for looking,
>Philippe
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick

Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] 2006 PAW Wk8)
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] 2006 PAW Wk8)