Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know Richard, since I don't make prints that often. I didn't test Noise Ninja, but decided to go for the Neat Image after some reading on the web. I do notice significant changes in 'actual pixels' size in PS though. But note that I'm still in the first part of the learning curve for the use of this program: still too often in auto mode ATM. Op 28-feb-06, om 17:15 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven: > Philippe - The on-line image looks quite noiseless. Does it look > good in 8x10 or 16x20? Does Neat Image do a better job than Noise > Ninja? > > >> o Wk7. Much professional work and a new light meter didn't get me >> further than test shots unworthy of presenting. But they got me >> acquainted to the different spot metering representation of the >> Sekonic L-558 than my old Pentax V. >> Wk8 is a shot of a domestic scene with the Digilux 2 at 400 ASA. I >> just installed NeatImage and made some noise profiles for the RAW >> formats at different speeds and wanted to test them (testing >> again, yes, it's that time of the year :-) on a real shot. It >> seems to work: >> >> http://www.fullflavor.be/photography/PAW2006/slides/Wk8.html >> >> Comments appreciated and >> Thanks for looking, >> Philippe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > -- > Regards, > > Dick > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >