Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Aperture on its way
From: kbingman at gmail.com (Keith Bingman)
Date: Sun Nov 27 12:29:13 2005
References: <4cfa589b0511270957w5b30c9dw9cf7fdcadba2ab96@mail.gmail.com> <22c93b290511271209l6de56d90pcdf44ea117923ce@mail.gmail.com> <4cfa589b0511271211ga322ca1l187a0c7c41ea91a6@mail.gmail.com> <22c93b290511271223k1faa007bh83e9c7eb27cf3d65@mail.gmail.com>

The claim is, and believe me I trust Apple just as much as you do,  
that exactly these "tricks" are needed by Aperture. It is part of the  
Core Image suite. Now, logically, a G4 with a newer graphic card  
should work, but like I said, we'll see.

Keith

On Nov 27, 2005, at 9:23 PM, Matt Powell wrote:

> On 11/27/05, Adam Bridge <abridge@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's on the Apple web site!
> That's what I wondered, because I think they're trying to pull a  
> fast one.
>
> The only difference in a 17"PB of recent vintage and a dual-G4 is that
> the PB has a 128MB graphics card that's capable of some of the new
> tricks found in OS X Tiger (the ripples when you drop a widget and
> such). Memory-wise and processor-wise, the dual should actually be
> superior.
>
> I suspect they're fudging the requirements to get people to buy a new
> G5 machine - but they can't do that with PBs since they never
> shoehorned in a G5.
>
> I love my Apple, but boy do I find the company frustrating much of  
> the time.
>
> --
> MP
> wooderson@gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Aperture on its way)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Aperture on its way)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Aperture on its way)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Aperture on its way)