Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] CL vs. CLE
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Mon Apr 25 16:29:39 2005
 
I wish I have jumped on Karen's CL offer :-) Anyway, I am looking for a 
small M mount camera for backup and the CL/CLE look to be pretty good 
choice. I have read all I could on Stephan Gandy's site and I still haven't 
quite decided which one to get yet. Any practical user level suggestions?

I'd imagine that this is a put a 40/2 or a 35/2 and leave it in the shirt 
pocket type of camera.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies: Reply from buzz.hausner at verizon.net (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] The CL...a Dissenting Opinion)
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)
Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)
Reply from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)
Reply from tim at KairosPhoto.com (Timothy Atherton) ([Leica] CL vs. CLE)