Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard wrote: > I wish I have jumped on Karen's CL offer :-) Anyway, I am looking for a > small M mount camera for backup and the CL/CLE look to be pretty good > choice. I have read all I could on Stephan Gandy's site and I still > haven't quite decided which one to get yet. Any practical user level > suggestions? > > I'd imagine that this is a put a 40/2 or a 35/2 and leave it in the > shirt pocket type of camera. > > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, > please use richard at imagecraft.com) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Hi Richard, I've owned both and liked the CLE the best because it has the 28 frame. Set on hyper focal distance combined with the AE and TTL you get the most sophisticated P&S around. But on my first CLE the electronics stopped, on my second the VF was too dim, a cla didn't help. The CL is lying somewhere in the cupboard. Bottom line for me is that a M6 is the most versatile and not that big after all. Best regards, Michiel Fokkema