Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Will, I agree - I really liked the LC1, but the form factor means it would be competing with my 20D for usage and would lose out every time. If I wanted/needed to take something small and light, then the LC1 wouldn't suit either. For that, at the moment I'm using a Fuji F810, but I'm not entirely happy with it. Would you be able to post a full-size image from your Sony for me to look at? I've tried a Samsung camera with a Zeiss lens, but the image quality wasn't good enough (for me at least). Thanks, Simon. On Apr 8, 2005 3:28 PM, Will von Dauster <vondauster@earthlink.net> wrote: > Hi All, > > Simon wrote (snipped): > > > However, the big decider for me was the image quality. Doubtless the > > LC1 is better than most if not all digital P&S cameras, but it's a > > long way behind the 20D in image quality. > > > Anyone else have similar or oposing opinions? > > A fair comparison and consistent with my own experience vv my 20D and a > good friend's LC1. This is not to say that the photos from the LC1 do > not have their own character, which I find pleasing. It's main drawback > is the limiting 5MP resolution. I wonder if we will see a 7.2 - 10MP > version with a better and faster viewfinder. That would be very > interesting to me. > > I'm actually quite pleased, for a point and shoot, with my Sony DSC-V3 > and its "Zeiss" lens. > > Will von Dauster > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >