Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi All, Simon wrote (snipped): > However, the big decider for me was the image quality. Doubtless the > LC1 is better than most if not all digital P&S cameras, but it's a > long way behind the 20D in image quality. > Anyone else have similar or oposing opinions? A fair comparison and consistent with my own experience vv my 20D and a good friend's LC1. This is not to say that the photos from the LC1 do not have their own character, which I find pleasing. It's main drawback is the limiting 5MP resolution. I wonder if we will see a 7.2 - 10MP version with a better and faster viewfinder. That would be very interesting to me. I'm actually quite pleased, for a point and shoot, with my Sony DSC-V3 and its "Zeiss" lens. Will von Dauster