Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Sat Feb 19 08:25:41 2005
References: <7b.3f332354.2f47db21@aol.com> <002d01c51627$849e9c50$833b6d18@ted> <4216BA9F.2070309@adrenaline.com> <001701c51645$6ea24550$833b6d18@ted>

Ted, that's a very good point. I just picked up my 2nd M body, a chrome .58
M6TTL, and finding a used sample in great condition was as easy as a quick
trip to Best Buy :-)

But I guess I also have some non-traditional desires for the M platform. 
I'd love a
company to pick up the ball and give me a nicer TTL flash system 
(horrors!) with
more options (like Nikon's, I guess), a built in spot meter, maybe an 
integrated
autowind film body, and of course, a nice stream of digital RF bodies 
going forward. 
Just dreaming, I guess :-)

That said, in spite of my Nikon film and digital kits (FM3a and D70), I 
shoot 90%
of my pics with my M6TTL(s) and FP4+/HP5+  and the little SF24 flash.  
And I'm
having a complete hoot doing so.

Scott

Ted Grant wrote:

> Scott McLoughlin said::
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout
>
>
>> Smallish, elegantly designed body. RF focusing. Smallish, excellent, 
>> interchangable prime
>> lenses. Great build quality.
>>
>> If other companies (Zeiss?) will deliver these goods in a sustained 
>> (that means digital at
>> some point) fashion into the future, I guess I don't really care 
>> about Leica. But right now,
>> Leica delivers the goods described above.<,,,,,
>
>
> But Scott if you already own one, a Leica M of some kind or several, 
> and there's thousands of M's floating about the world for at least the 
> next 40 years, who the hell cares if the mother company goes belly up? 
> All this whining, hand wringing by others, save the company buy a 
> bunch of cameras crap is rediculous for a company that's been dragging 
> it's ass back in the 30's, '40's & 50's when it was the greatest. I 
> can't believe some of the silly concerns it's almost like if they 
> crash and burn every owner in the world will die immediately with 
> them? Nonsense!
>
> I've got 3 M7's, an M6, 3 R8's an SL and a couple of older RF models, 
> 1932 etc. And if Leica folds in Solms tomorow the only thing I feel 
> sorry for are the people working there. But I'll still have my Leicas 
> and I've got lots of film despite the fact I haven't shot a roll in 
> months because I'm doing 20D digital with my adapted Leica glass! But 
> I know I've got a Leica or three I can use for the next 50 years, so 
> who needs the mother company?
>
> ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout)
In reply to: Message from Thinkofcole at aol.com (Thinkofcole@aol.com) ([Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica Solms LUG LHSA Buyout)