Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think it's supposed to be "DJ", Jeffery. OJ ... I thought "orange juice" first ... but I realized soon enough who you meant :) Daniel On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Jeffery Smith wrote: > Jeeze...even the Swedes don't like OJ. > > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:51:38 +0100 (MET), Daniel Ridings > <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no> wrote: > > I've used the 50/2.8 quite often. Don't know why. Because it's small, I > > guess. > > > > It figures in at least three PAW's last year: > > > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/1.html > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/2.html > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/44.html > > > > I like it enough to consider getting the new version and off-load the old > > one. > > > > Then again ... I'm starting to get partial to Leica's 1.4 offerings ... > > (not the new Summilux though. It's probably great, but I can't afford > > it.) > > > > Daniel > > > > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > > > > > The Elmar-M is adequate at any aperture. Judging from what's been shown > > > on the list as examples, those images for the most part suffer from > > > camera motion and poor post production adjustments. > > > S. Dimitrov > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >