Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat Jan 15 09:36:42 2005
References: <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACCEPJCGAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net> <p06200704be0ed3a4cbce@[131.142.12.152]> <000e01c4fb18$a79d7e80$42ec4142@D1S9FY41>
The Elmar-M is adequate at any aperture. Judging from what's been shown
on the list as examples, those images for the most part suffer from
camera motion and poor post production adjustments.
S. Dimitrov
Replies:
Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
In reply to:
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)